مدیریت و کارآفرینی در ورزش

مدیریت و کارآفرینی در ورزش

ارائه مدل رفتار کارآفرینانه مدیران سازمان های ورزشی ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
پریسا نیازی
رسول نظری
گروه مدیریت ورزشی، دانشکده علوم ورزشی، واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان) ، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اصفهان ، ایران
10.48301/jmes.2023.171872
چکیده
پژوهش حاضر با هدف تدوین ارائه مدل رفتار کارآفرینانه مدیران سازمان های ورزشی ایران بود. شرکت‌کنندگان در پژوهش حاضر، متخصصان و صاحب‌نظران حوزه مدیریت ورزشی، کارآفرینی بودند. روش نمونه گیری پژوهش، روش نظری بود؛ نمونه گیری تا رسیدن مقوله ها به اشباع نظری ادامه یافت؛ و بعد از 15 مصاحبه اشباع نظری صورت گرفت. ابزار پژوهش حاضر، مصاحبه های عمیق و اکتشافی بود. اعتبار یافته ها با روش های تطبیق توسط اعضا، بررسی همکار و مصاحبه های آزمایشی تعیین شد و براساس نظریۀ داده‌بنیاد با رویکرد ساخت گرای چارمز، داده‌ها کدگذاری و تجزیه و تحلیل شدند. مدل رفتار کارآفرینانه مدیران سازمان های ورزشی در قالب 9کد اصلی یکپارچه‌سازی مقوله‌ها بر مبنای روابط موجود بین آن‌ها، حول محور رفتار کارآفرینانه مدیران، شکل گرفت. یافته‌ها نشان داد که رفتارهای کارآفرینانه مدیران، قابلیت اثر‌گذاری بر تصمیمات مدیران ورزشی را دارا می‌باشد. در پایان به این نکته اشاره می شود که سازمان های ورزشی زیادی در مواجه با پاندمی کرونا و محیط های متغیر بازار و نوآوری های پیش آمده و تغییر در تقاضای مشتریان قرار گرفته اند که به نظر می رسد با داشتن آگاهی نسبت به این تغییر و پذیرش وقوع قطعی تغییرات به جای ترس از آن بهتر می توانند این مسیر را طی کنند و با خلاقیت و کارآفرینی این دوران را سپری و سازمان های کوچک و بزرگ ورزشی بتوانند به حیات خود ادامه دهند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
رفتار
کارآفرینانه
ساخت گرا
سازمان
ورزشی

عنوان مقاله English

Presenting a model of entrepreneurial behavior of managers of Iranian sports organizations

نویسندگان English

Parisa Niazy
Rasool Nazari
Department of Sports Management , Faculty of Sports Sciences, Isfahan (Khorasgan)branch , Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
چکیده English

The aim of this study was to develop a model of entrepreneurial behavior of managers of Iranian sports organizations. Participants in the present study were experts and experts in the field of sports management, entrepreneurship. The sampling method of the research was theoretical; Sampling continued until the categories reached theoretical saturation; and after 15 interviews, theoretical saturation took place. The tools of the present study were in-depth and exploratory interviews. The validity of the findings was determined by matching methods by members, peer review and experimental interviews, and based on data-based theory with Charms constructivist approach, the data were coded and analyzed. The model of entrepreneurial behavior of managers of sports organizations was formed in the form of 9 main codes of integration of categories based on the existing relationships between them, around the axis of entrepreneurial behavior of managers. Findings showed that managers' entrepreneurial behaviors have the ability to influence the decisions of sports managers in the corona pandemic. In the end, it is pointed out that many sports organizations are faced with the corona pandemic and changing market environments and the innovations and changes that have occurred in the demand of customers, which seems to be aware of this change and acceptance. The definite occurrence of change, instead of being afraid of it, can better take this path and pass this period with creativity and entrepreneurship, and small and large sports organizations can continue their life.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Entrepreneurial
behavior
Constructionist
Sports
organizations
1. Ahmadi F, Shafi'i R, Mafakheri Nia F. (2012) Investigating the effect of individual and environmental factors on the entrepreneurial behavior of Kurdistan University students. Entrepreneurship Development; 4 (15): 145-163 (Persian).
2. Alizadeh M. (2015) The Impact of Management Skills on the Entrepreneurial Behavior of NAJA Employees (Case Study: NAJA Organization in Aran and Bidgol). Quarterly Journal of Resource Management in Law Enforcement; 3 (2): 143-160 (Persian).
3. Bird B, Schjoedt L. (2009). Entrepreneurial behavior: Its nature, scope, recent research, and agenda for future research. In A. L.
4. Charmaz K. (2019) With Constructivist Grounded Theory You Can’t Hide: Social Justice Research and Critical Inquiry in the Public Sphere. Qualitative Inquiry;26 (2):165-176.
5. Fereydooni, M., & Jalali Farahani, M. (2017). The Model of the Relationship between Processes of Knowledge Management and Strategic Thinking. Sport Management Journal, 8(6), 874-861. (Persian).
6. Ghanbari Ghaleroudkhani, F., & Moazen Jamshidi, M. (2022). The Factors Affecting on Creativity and Innovation of Military Personnel: A Meta-Analysis. Innovation Management Journal, 10(4), 63-88.(Persian). Gibb A, Ritchie J. (1982) Understanding the Process of Starting Small Businesses. International Small Business Journal; 1: 26-45.
7. Golzadeh, H., & Alvedari, H. (2021). The effect of managers' entrepreneurial characteristics on innovative behavior through evaluation of postal service performance (Case study: Tehran Postal Zone 13). Journal of Innovation and Creativity in Human Science, 10(4), 225-240. (Persian).
8. González-Rodríguez, M. R., Díaz-Fernández, M. C., & Gómez, C. P. (2020). Facial-expression recognition: An emergent approach to the measurement of tourist satisfaction through emotions. Telematics and Informatics, 51, 101404.
9. Goodarzi M, Nazari R, Ehsani M. (2012) Presenting a structural equation model of the effect of communication skills on management skills of sports managers. Applied Research of Sport Management; 1 (1): 11-20 (Persian).
11-00 ،)1041( ارائه مدل رفتار کارآفرینانه مدیران سازمانهای ورزشی دوفصلنامه مدیریت و کارآفرینی ورزشی، 1
22
10. Gordon YJ, Young A, Bal J. (2003) External environment forces affect-tingg e-learning providers. marketing intelligence & planning; 21 (3): 168-172.
11. Kalateh Sadati A K, Lankarani M H, Bagheri Lankarani K. (2020) Risk Society, Global Vulnerability and Fragile Resilience; Sociological View on the Coronavirus Outbreak, Shiraz E-Med J. Online ahead of Print; 21(4):e102263.
12. madhoshi, M., tabibi, M., & delavari, H. (2013). Investigating the Impact of Market Orientation and Entrepreneurial Orientation on Innovation in SMEs. Iranian Journal of Trade Studies, 17(65), 115-136. (Persian).
13. Mair J. (2005). Entrepreneurial behavior in a large traditional firm: Exploring key drivers. Corporate entrepreneurship and venturing; 49-72.
14. Marzban S, Moghimi M, Arabs A.(2010). The effect of organizational entrepreneurship atmosphere on entrepreneurial behavior of managers. Quarterly Journal of Modern Economics and Business: 21: 1-25 (Persian).
15. Mirsafian H. (2016). The Study of Relationship between Managers’ Transformational Leadership Style and Employees’ Entrepreneurial Behaviors. Applied Research of Sport Management; 4(4):41-35 (Persian).
16. Moghimi M, Zali M, Marzian S. (2014) Investigating the entrepreneurial behavior of middle managers of the University of Tehran. Journal of Executive Management; 6 (11): 124-144 (Persian).
17. Mohammad Kazemi R, Qhasemi H, Rustam Bakhsh M. (2011). Identification and Analysis of Behavioral Barriers to Organizational Entrepreneurship in the Physical Education Organization (Ministry of Sports), Sports Management and Motor Science Research; 1(2): 89-100 (Persian).
18. Parnell D, Widdop P, Bond A, Wilson R. (2020). COVID-19, networks and sport. Managing Sport and Leisure; 15: 1-7.
19. Pellegrini, M. M., Rialti, R., Marzi, G., & Caputo, A. (2020). Sport entrepreneurship: A synthesis of existing literature and future perspectives. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 16(3), 795-826.
20. Poor S, Mortazavi S, Legzian M, Malekzadeh G. (2017). Analysis of the behavioral components of managers in strengthening the extra-role
11-00 ،)1041( ، 1
behaviors of the assistants of Imam Khomeini's Relief Committee. Strategic Management Thought; 11 (1): 171-200 (Persian).
21. Rauch AJ, Frese M. (2007). Born to be an entrepreneur? Revisiting the personality approach to entrepreneurship. The psychology of entrepreneurship. The organizational frontiers; 41-65.
22. Safania A, Barahmand R. (2020). Evaluating the effects of coronavirus in the sports industry. Quarterly of Educational Psychology, Allameh Tabataba’i University; 16(56): 120-131 (Persian).
23. Sajadi A, Razavi M, Kurdlu H.(2019). The Impact of Organizational Learning Capabilities on Organizational Entrepreneurship in the Ministry of Sports and Youth of Iran. Journal of Sport Management and Motor Behavior; 11 (30): 241-255(Persian).
24. Samad Aghaee J. (2009). ntrepreneurial organizations. Tehran. Public Management Training Center. First Edition (Persian).
25. Sarlak A, (2015). Ghiasabadi Farahani M. The Impact of Entrepreneurial Behavior on Organizational Innovation (Study: Small and Medium Manufacturing Companies in Arak). International Conference on New Research in Management, Economics and Accounting;The second period (Persian).
26. Scheiner CW. (2019). Fundamental Determinants of Entrepreneurial Behaviour. Gabler;7-9.
27. Sobouti F, Moallem Savasari A, Aryana M, Mesgarani A. (2020). Coronavirus as a New Challenge for Infection Control in Dentistry: A Literature Review. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci;30(186):185-194 (Persian).
28. World Health Organization. (2020). Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) situation report-71.Available from: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200331-sitrep-71-covid-19.pdf?sfvrsn=4360e92b_8
29. Zabudar M, Imanipour N, Talibi K, Hosseini R. (2015). stablish a model for deciding to start a new business with a data theory approach. Innovation Management; 5 (2): 109-134 (Persian).
30. Zampetekis L A, Moustakis V. (2007). entrepreneurial behavior in the Greek public sector, international journal of entrepreneurial Behavior & Research; 13(1):19-38.
مدیریت و کارآفرینی در ورزش
دوره 1، شماره 1
پاییز و زمستان
اسفند 1401
صفحه 22-34